BENGALURU – A daily wage worker from the western Indian state of Maharashtra is fighting Facebook over a pair of shoes he bought but never received.
Mr Tribhuvan Lalchand Bhongade, 30, a farmhand in Umri village, Gondia district, won the first legal round, with a consumer court directing Facebook India,the Indian arm of social media giant Meta, to pay him 25,000 rupees (S$410) as compensation.
As the company got the order stayed in a higher court, the labourer is now preparing for a longer battle.
Mr Bhongade does seasonal farm work like driving a tractor and herding goats, but was unemployed during the nationwide lockdown to battle the Covid-19 pandemic.
In September 2020, he had noticed an advertisement on Facebook for a heavily discounted pair of Nike shoes.
I am not a big shopper, but my one pair of shoes was worn out, the regular social media user told The Straits Times on the phone.
Using his debit card, he bought the shoes on Facebook, sold by a vendor named Marya Studios, for 599 rupees a steal.
Over a month passed, but he received neither the shoes nor any messages about shipping.
Facebook did not have any contact details of Marya Studio, so I Googled the name, found five customer care numbers and called one, said Mr Bhongade.
A person who claimed to be Marya Studios customer care executive sent him a link with which to fill in bank details for a refund.
Mr Bhongade followed the steps and ended up downloading a phishing app, AnyDesk. His entire bank balance 7,568 rupees was debited later that day.
I panicked and called my friend, he said. The friend was lawyer Sagar Chavan, 27, who usually handled High Court cases in Mumbai but was back in his native village during the pandemic.
Mr Chavan complained to the police and informed Facebook about the fraud via Twitter and e-mail.
When there was no reply, he filed a complaint against Facebook on Oct 12, 2020, with the local District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Marya Studio was uncontactable. It was clearly a scam company. We felt Facebook had to take some responsibility as the platform that hosted and earned revenue from a fraud ad, said Mr Chavan.
Facebook India objected to the complaint, saying Mr Bhongade was not its consumer as it was not the seller.
It also asserted that as an intermediary of the American company, it had no obligation under Indian technology laws to monitor the ads it ran.
On June 30, 2022, the consumer commission ordered in Mr Bhongades favour, directing Facebook to pay him a compensation of 25,000 rupees.
Facebook was not held liable for the second transaction, because it was the complainant himself who shared sensitive bank details.
The commission also ordered Facebook to runcorrective advertisements in the media and online to create scam awareness and neutralise the impact of misleading advertisements.
Facebook also has to submit quarterly compliance reports to the commission for two years. More On This Topic Australian mining billionaire files lawsuit against Facebook over scam ads Australia watchdog sues Facebook-owner Meta over 'false' cryptocurrency ads The company appealed in the Bombay High Court, which stayed the consumer commissions order in September but ordered Facebook to submit the compensatory amount to the court.
Mr Chavan said the next hearing was slated for January and that he was prepared to help a poor man fight a rich company, however long it took.He will continue to represent Mr Bhongade for free.
Facebook India declined to respond to STs queries on this case or say whether there have been similar cases.
Facebook Indias ad revenue grew 74 per cent in 2022 to cross the US$22 billion mark (S$30 billion) one of the companys biggest revenue streams in Asia.
India is among the fastest growing digital ad markets in the world, with Meta and Google dominating the space in 2021.
Countries like Australia and Britain have demanded more accountability from Facebooks parent company Meta for hosting advertisements from businesses that defraud their citizens.
It may take longer for the Indian authorities to do the same, as there are no specific laws in the country governing buying and selling on social media platforms.
To safeguard users in a changing digital market scenario, Facebook and Meta could have stricter policies and verification processes for its advertisers, Mr Ankit Sharma, head of media strategy at digital marketer FCB Kinnect, told fact-checking website Boom Live.
It could also have scam awareness campaigns like it did to curb misinformation in its other arm, WhatsApp, he added.
On a cold dawn morning on Dec 18, Mr Bongade sent ST a video of himself on a tractor on a farm. He was wearing his frayed old shoes.
I earn just enough to eat, he said. But my principle is this: I was wronged, and I want to prevent others from getting cheated. More On This Topic Police warn of fake restaurant reservation scams during festive season Australia charges four Chinese nationals over US-based scam